- Prior 5.25%
- Bank rate vote 4-0-5 vs 4-0-5 expected (Pill, Mann, Haskel, Greene dissented to keep rates on hold)
- Decision was “finely balanced”
- Domestic inflationary persistence is expected to fade away over the next few years
- There is a risk that inflationary pressures from second-round effects will be more enduring in the medium-term
- Need to be careful not to cut rates too quickly or by too much
- Will ensure bank rate stays restrictive for sufficiently long to return inflation to 2% target sustainably
- Will decide on degree of policy restrictiveness at each meeting
- There is uncertainty about interaction between cutting bank rate and quantitative tightening
- Full statement
This article was written by Justin Low at www.forexlive.com.
Leave a comment